Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
Merchant banker regulation consolidates registration, governance, capital, reporting, outsourcing and investor-protection requirements under an update...
Section 115JB applied to the assessee because the statute does not require a company to be dividend-paying before book profit taxation can be invoked, and the Tribunal applied strict interpretation to reject exclusion on assumption or presumption. It also distinguished precedents cited for earlier assessment years and held that the amended provision effective from 01.04.2012 governed the matter, so the lower appellate view on MAT computation was affirmed. On MAT credit, the year being an abated assessment under section 153A left the assessment open to fresh computation on regular and incriminating material, so the assessee's claim was maintainable in principle and consequential relief was directed to be recomputed.
Section 115JB applied to the assessee because the statute does not require a company to be dividend-paying before book profit taxation can be invoked, and the Tribunal applied strict interpretation to reject exclusion on assumption or presumption. It also distinguished precedents cited for earlier assessment years and held that the amended provision effective from 01.04.2012 governed the matter, so the lower appellate view on MAT computation was affirmed. On MAT credit, the year being an abated assessment under section 153A left the assessment open to fresh computation on regular and incriminating material, so the assessee's claim was maintainable in principle and consequential relief was directed to be recomputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.