Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Section 115JB applied to the assessee because the statute does not require a company to be dividend-paying before book profit taxation can be invoked, and the Tribunal applied strict interpretation to reject exclusion on assumption or presumption. It also distinguished precedents cited for earlier assessment years and held that the amended provision effective from 01.04.2012 governed the matter, so the lower appellate view on MAT computation was affirmed. On MAT credit, the year being an abated assessment under section 153A left the assessment open to fresh computation on regular and incriminating material, so the assessee's claim was maintainable in principle and consequential relief was directed to be recomputed.
Section 115JB applied to the assessee because the statute does not require a company to be dividend-paying before book profit taxation can be invoked, and the Tribunal applied strict interpretation to reject exclusion on assumption or presumption. It also distinguished precedents cited for earlier assessment years and held that the amended provision effective from 01.04.2012 governed the matter, so the lower appellate view on MAT computation was affirmed. On MAT credit, the year being an abated assessment under section 153A left the assessment open to fresh computation on regular and incriminating material, so the assessee's claim was maintainable in principle and consequential relief was directed to be recomputed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.