Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Section 54 exemption was allowed for investment in more than one residential property, with the Tribunal accepting that the word "a" can encompass more than one house where supported by precedent. It also held that investments made after the due date for filing the income tax return could still be considered for exemption, even if not deposited in the capital gains scheme, and directed the Assessing Officer to allow relief on that basis. The result was that the assessee remained eligible for Section 54 relief on both the multiple-property investment and the delayed investment.
Section 54 exemption was allowed for investment in more than one residential property, with the Tribunal accepting that the word "a" can encompass more than one house where supported by precedent. It also held that investments made after the due date for filing the income tax return could still be considered for exemption, even if not deposited in the capital gains scheme, and directed the Assessing Officer to allow relief on that basis. The result was that the assessee remained eligible for Section 54 relief on both the multiple-property investment and the delayed investment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.