Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Section 54 exemption was allowed for investment in more than one residential property, with the Tribunal accepting that the word "a" can encompass more than one house where supported by precedent. It also held that investments made after the due date for filing the income tax return could still be considered for exemption, even if not deposited in the capital gains scheme, and directed the Assessing Officer to allow relief on that basis. The result was that the assessee remained eligible for Section 54 relief on both the multiple-property investment and the delayed investment.
Section 54 exemption was allowed for investment in more than one residential property, with the Tribunal accepting that the word "a" can encompass more than one house where supported by precedent. It also held that investments made after the due date for filing the income tax return could still be considered for exemption, even if not deposited in the capital gains scheme, and directed the Assessing Officer to allow relief on that basis. The result was that the assessee remained eligible for Section 54 relief on both the multiple-property investment and the delayed investment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.