Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An order granting valuation and the first opportunity to purchase shares was treated as self-operative: once the fair value reports were available, the appellant had to accept the valuation and indicate willingness to buy, without any further formal offer. By rejecting the higher valuation and seeking averaging of the reports, the appellant failed to exercise the first option, so the respondents' right to purchase the shares at the accepted fair value crystallised. The Tribunal also held that a later challenge to the valuation and a belated offer to buy could not revive a waived right after the arrangement had been acted upon. The appeal was dismissed and the sale in favour of the respondents was sustained.
An order granting valuation and the first opportunity to purchase shares was treated as self-operative: once the fair value reports were available, the appellant had to accept the valuation and indicate willingness to buy, without any further formal offer. By rejecting the higher valuation and seeking averaging of the reports, the appellant failed to exercise the first option, so the respondents' right to purchase the shares at the accepted fair value crystallised. The Tribunal also held that a later challenge to the valuation and a belated offer to buy could not revive a waived right after the arrangement had been acted upon. The appeal was dismissed and the sale in favour of the respondents was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.