Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Cash can fall within the wide definition of property under the PBPT Act, and where funds are transferred through entities controlled by another person and later routed back, both the transfer and temporary holding may satisfy section 2(9)(A); the routed entities are treated as benamidars and the provider as beneficial owner. Disclosure in an income-tax return or payment of tax does not, by itself, bar PBPT proceedings because the Act operates alongside the Income-tax Act and serves a distinct confiscatory purpose. Where tax has already been paid on the routed amount, the attachable benami property may be reduced to that extent. In a running business, transformed assets such as stock and receivables may remain attachable as converted form of benami property.
Cash can fall within the wide definition of property under the PBPT Act, and where funds are transferred through entities controlled by another person and later routed back, both the transfer and temporary holding may satisfy section 2(9)(A); the routed entities are treated as benamidars and the provider as beneficial owner. Disclosure in an income-tax return or payment of tax does not, by itself, bar PBPT proceedings because the Act operates alongside the Income-tax Act and serves a distinct confiscatory purpose. Where tax has already been paid on the routed amount, the attachable benami property may be reduced to that extent. In a running business, transformed assets such as stock and receivables may remain attachable as converted form of benami property.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.