Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Risk-based postal import clearance standardises electronic assessment, document requests, duty realisation and delivery controls at Foreign Post Offic...
Customs Cargo Service Provider appointment extends custodianship to additional terminal land, subject to cargo-control, security and licence condition...
IGST exemption on imported engine stands claimed under Sr. No. 557B of Notification No. 50/2017 was remitted for fresh decision because the show cause notice itself treated the imports as lease-based and the existing bond documents were on record; the Principal Commissioner was directed to reconsider the claim after allowing the importer to file the lease agreements and supporting material. Classification of the engine stands was also remitted, as the Tribunal noted its earlier decision in Interglobe Aviation Ltd. classifying such goods under CTI 8609 00 00 rather than CTI 8716 39 00, and directed fresh examination in that light. No final merits determination was made on either issue.
IGST exemption on imported engine stands claimed under Sr. No. 557B of Notification No. 50/2017 was remitted for fresh decision because the show cause notice itself treated the imports as lease-based and the existing bond documents were on record; the Principal Commissioner was directed to reconsider the claim after allowing the importer to file the lease agreements and supporting material. Classification of the engine stands was also remitted, as the Tribunal noted its earlier decision in Interglobe Aviation Ltd. classifying such goods under CTI 8609 00 00 rather than CTI 8716 39 00, and directed fresh examination in that light. No final merits determination was made on either issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.