Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
IGST exemption on imported engine stands claimed under Sr. No. 557B of Notification No. 50/2017 was remitted for fresh decision because the show cause notice itself treated the imports as lease-based and the existing bond documents were on record; the Principal Commissioner was directed to reconsider the claim after allowing the importer to file the lease agreements and supporting material. Classification of the engine stands was also remitted, as the Tribunal noted its earlier decision in Interglobe Aviation Ltd. classifying such goods under CTI 8609 00 00 rather than CTI 8716 39 00, and directed fresh examination in that light. No final merits determination was made on either issue.
IGST exemption on imported engine stands claimed under Sr. No. 557B of Notification No. 50/2017 was remitted for fresh decision because the show cause notice itself treated the imports as lease-based and the existing bond documents were on record; the Principal Commissioner was directed to reconsider the claim after allowing the importer to file the lease agreements and supporting material. Classification of the engine stands was also remitted, as the Tribunal noted its earlier decision in Interglobe Aviation Ltd. classifying such goods under CTI 8609 00 00 rather than CTI 8716 39 00, and directed fresh examination in that light. No final merits determination was made on either issue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.