Inventory write-off and fraudulent/wrongful trading allegations in corporate insolvency led to director liability principles applied and appeal dismis...
Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Limited scrutiny cannot be expanded into complete scrutiny without the written approval mandated by CBDT Instruction No. 7/2014; the Tribunal found that the assessment was enlarged beyond the original capital gains issue without such approval, so the assessment was quashed. Section 69A was not barred merely because the share acquisition transactions related to time-barred years, as the Tribunal treated the deeming fiction as sufficient to permit enquiry. For section 54F, exemption cannot be denied solely because the residential property was not conveyed by a registered sale deed; where purchase and investment within the statutory period were shown, the denial was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed.
Limited scrutiny cannot be expanded into complete scrutiny without the written approval mandated by CBDT Instruction No. 7/2014; the Tribunal found that the assessment was enlarged beyond the original capital gains issue without such approval, so the assessment was quashed. Section 69A was not barred merely because the share acquisition transactions related to time-barred years, as the Tribunal treated the deeming fiction as sufficient to permit enquiry. For section 54F, exemption cannot be denied solely because the residential property was not conveyed by a registered sale deed; where purchase and investment within the statutory period were shown, the denial was unsustainable. The appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.