Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.