Concessional Basic Customs Duty on Ethernet switches: classification as enterprise switches upheld, challenge dismissed for lack of substantial law qu...
Insolvency petition based on admitted debt and default upheld; challenge for malicious initiation rejected, settlement may proceed under resolution fr...
Quashing of FIR and challenge to ECIR over alleged diversion of funds and preferential ESOP pricing dismissed after prima facie money-laundering findi...
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4816 
Join Channel 
