Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Processing of TDS statements under section 200A could not, for periods before 01.06.2015, be used to compute and levy late fee under section 234E because the enabling provision came into force only from that date. For quarterly TDS returns relating to FY 2014-15, the levy raised in the intimation under section 200A was therefore without authority and invalid. The Tribunal followed jurisdictional High Court and co-ordinate bench rulings and directed deletion of the late fee charged in the intimation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
