Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computational.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.