Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Page of 4819
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96363 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computational.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.