Revisability of return invalidation communications under tax procedure affirmed, impugned non revisional finding quashed and matter remitted for fresh...
Transferable duty credit scrips validity and bona fide transferee entitlement to exemption upheld where scrips were subsisting at import, appeals allo...
Classification of knocked down motor vehicle component imports: Notification benefit denied because items are standalone non kit parts requiring subst...
Reassessment against a deceased assessee: procedural defect mandates fresh reassessment; nonresponsive petitioner may be treated as legal representati...
Page of 4814
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6461 to 6480 of 96262 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the...
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computational.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was held unsustainable where the income had already been disclosed in returns filed in response to section 153A notices and accepted in assessment, because such disclosure could not by itself amount to concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars. The Tribunal also found that the remaining additions were only estimated deemed brokerage adjustments and calculation errors, which did not meet the statutory threshold for penalty. On those facts, the penalties for the relevant assessment years were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.