Penalty under section 271(1)(c) deleted where income was disclosed in section 153A returns and remaining additions were only estimated or computationa...
ITAT upheld rejection of the books of account because the assessee's cash sales, cash on hand and pre-demonetisation cash deposits showed an abnormal rise, while the supporting invoices were incomplete, generic and not backed by genuine evidence, so the accounts did not reflect a true and correct picture of business. On unexplained demonetisation-period cash deposits, the Tribunal accepted credit for the opening cash balance and bank withdrawals where no discrepancy was found, and sustained addition only for the balance amount remaining unexplained. It further held that the sustained addition under section 68 was taxable at the special rate under section 115BBE for AY 2017-18.
ITAT upheld rejection of the books of account because the assessee's cash sales, cash on hand and pre-demonetisation cash deposits showed an abnormal rise, while the supporting invoices were incomplete, generic and not backed by genuine evidence, so the accounts did not reflect a true and correct picture of business. On unexplained demonetisation-period cash deposits, the Tribunal accepted credit for the opening cash balance and bank withdrawals where no discrepancy was found, and sustained addition only for the balance amount remaining unexplained. It further held that the sustained addition under section 68 was taxable at the special rate under section 115BBE for AY 2017-18.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
