Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.