Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.