Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Genuine share trading transactions executed through a registered broker on the stock exchange, reflected in DEMAT and trading records, and settled through banking channels were held to support allowability of the resulting business loss. The Tribunal held that the loss could not be disallowed merely because the Revenue considered the trades commercially imprudent or compared them with book value, in the absence of material showing artificial loss creation, sham trades, or price manipulation. It further held that SEBI proceedings against company promoters and penny-stock rulings on bogus exempt gains were inapplicable where the assessee's own transactions were genuine trading transactions, and the addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.