Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
141 to 160 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had voluntarily disclosed additional income in the return filed under section 153C and paid tax and interest before assessment proceedings began. The Tribunal treated the earlier omission in the section 139 return as an inadvertent, bona fide mistake and relied on the principle that penalty is not automatic merely because higher income is later offered and accepted. On those facts, the disclosure and payment were held sufficient to negate penalty.
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had voluntarily disclosed additional income in the return filed under section 153C and paid tax and interest before assessment proceedings began. The Tribunal treated the earlier omission in the section 139 return as an inadvertent, bona fide mistake and relied on the principle that penalty is not automatic merely because higher income is later offered and accepted. On those facts, the disclosure and payment were held sufficient to negate penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.