Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had voluntarily disclosed additional income in the return filed under section 153C and paid tax and interest before assessment proceedings began. The Tribunal treated the earlier omission in the section 139 return as an inadvertent, bona fide mistake and relied on the principle that penalty is not automatic merely because higher income is later offered and accepted. On those facts, the disclosure and payment were held sufficient to negate penalty.
Penalty under section 270A was deleted because the assessee had voluntarily disclosed additional income in the return filed under section 153C and paid tax and interest before assessment proceedings began. The Tribunal treated the earlier omission in the section 139 return as an inadvertent, bona fide mistake and relied on the principle that penalty is not automatic merely because higher income is later offered and accepted. On those facts, the disclosure and payment were held sufficient to negate penalty.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.