Misdeclaration of quantity rejected where supplier evidence established counting errors, so reassessment, confiscation and redemption fine were set as...
Admissibility of electronic evidence controls valuation and penalty exposure; non compliant e records and statements nullify revaluation and penalties...
Refund claims arising from an appellate order must be filed within one year from the date of that order under Section 27(1B)(b); the later filing here was therefore time-barred. The Tribunal also held that Section 26 did not apply because the case was not one of return or re-importation of exported goods, and in any event that provision contained its own time requirement, which was not met. The pending Revenue appeal did not alter the statutory limitation period. The rejection of the refund application on limitation grounds was upheld.
Refund claims arising from an appellate order must be filed within one year from the date of that order under Section 27(1B)(b); the later filing here was therefore time-barred. The Tribunal also held that Section 26 did not apply because the case was not one of return or re-importation of exported goods, and in any event that provision contained its own time requirement, which was not met. The pending Revenue appeal did not alter the statutory limitation period. The rejection of the refund application on limitation grounds was upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4811 
Join Channel 
