Rectification of mistake remains limited to self-evident record errors, preventing merits review through miscellaneous applications and preserving fin...
Tender creditworthiness conditions may extend to de facto Promoter Directors, with post-participation challenges generally barred absent arbitrariness...
Corporate representation in PMLA summons proceedings permitted through an authorised signatory, subject to directors' continuing cooperation and atten...
Helicopter charter classification requires effective control analysis, while territorial performance, reasoned credit orders and wilful suppression de...
Specified fund definition expands PAN exemption eligibility for registered alternative investment funds and qualifying International Financial Service...
Tax exemption for specified legal-services authority income applies retrospectively, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and...
NCLAT held that bankruptcy proceedings against personal guarantors were a lawful consequence of an unchallenged order under Section 114(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Once the repayment-plan stage had been exhausted and no viable plan was submitted, the Adjudicating Authority could proceed under Section 115(2) and Section 121 without issuing a fresh show-cause notice or hearing at the bankruptcy stage. Rule 37 of the NCLT Rules was treated as inapplicable to reopen a process already completed, and the appellants were bound by waiver and finality of the earlier adjudicatory order. The bankruptcy order was therefore upheld.
NCLAT held that bankruptcy proceedings against personal guarantors were a lawful consequence of an unchallenged order under Section 114(1) of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code. Once the repayment-plan stage had been exhausted and no viable plan was submitted, the Adjudicating Authority could proceed under Section 115(2) and Section 121 without issuing a fresh show-cause notice or hearing at the bankruptcy stage. Rule 37 of the NCLT Rules was treated as inapplicable to reopen a process already completed, and the appellants were bound by waiver and finality of the earlier adjudicatory order. The bankruptcy order was therefore upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
