Works contract classification governs composite layout-development contracts where VAT-paid goods are transferred alongside construction and infrastru...
Specified income tax exemption for pollution control body remains conditional on non-commercial activity, unchanged income character, and return filin...
Jurisdictional facts in certificate-of-origin discrepancies can support customs show-cause proceedings, leaving factual explanations for departmental ...
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.