Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
