Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
An NCLAT order was set aside where the Adjudicating Authority directed release of charge over the entire land and implementation of a resolution plan without hearing affected parties, without recording reasons, and without considering a subsisting interim order of the Appellate Tribunal. The Tribunal held that judicial propriety required the earlier status quo order to be taken into account, and that passing directions at the first hearing without objections, fair hearing, or application of mind breached audi alteram partem and natural justice. The impugned directions were quashed, and the matter was remitted for fresh consideration, if necessary, after accounting for the interim order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
