Courier transshipment of imported goods via named carrier to air cargo stations renewed until 30.01.2026; exemption conditional, strict controls apply...
Insurer's investment gains and investment write-downs face Section 263 revision; enquiry upheld, Rule 5(b)(ii) lapse sustained, late corrigendum quash...
An apparent clerical error in the summary assessment could not be carried forward to reject a Section 128A GST amnesty waiver application. The original order showed that the demand comprised tax, interest and penalty, with penalty being only a part of the total demand, so the authority was required to examine the waiver request on the correct basis and on its own merits. The High Court set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after treating the demand as consisting of tax, interest and penalty and after hearing the petitioner.
An apparent clerical error in the summary assessment could not be carried forward to reject a Section 128A GST amnesty waiver application. The original order showed that the demand comprised tax, interest and penalty, with penalty being only a part of the total demand, so the authority was required to examine the waiver request on the correct basis and on its own merits. The High Court set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after treating the demand as consisting of tax, interest and penalty and after hearing the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
