Assessment time-barred u/s 153 due to missing competent-authority reference for Singapore exchange of information; assessment disallowed as barred by ...
Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
An apparent clerical error in the summary assessment could not be carried forward to reject a Section 128A GST amnesty waiver application. The original order showed that the demand comprised tax, interest and penalty, with penalty being only a part of the total demand, so the authority was required to examine the waiver request on the correct basis and on its own merits. The High Court set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after treating the demand as consisting of tax, interest and penalty and after hearing the petitioner.
An apparent clerical error in the summary assessment could not be carried forward to reject a Section 128A GST amnesty waiver application. The original order showed that the demand comprised tax, interest and penalty, with penalty being only a part of the total demand, so the authority was required to examine the waiver request on the correct basis and on its own merits. The High Court set aside the rejection order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration after treating the demand as consisting of tax, interest and penalty and after hearing the petitioner.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
