Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Continuing offence of money-laundering: discharge set aside and proceedings reinstated where laundering continued after inclusion of predicate offence...
Leasehold rights used to obtain land and set up a manufacturing facility were treated as an enabling service received for construction on the appellant's own account, so the first condition of the ITC bar under section 17(5)(d) was satisfied. Applying annexation, object, intendment and marketability tests, the Authority held that the air separation plant was an immovable manufacturing facility meant for permanent beneficial enjoyment of the leased land, not a standalone apparatus, equipment or machinery. As the facility did not fall within the statutory meaning of plant and machinery, the exclusion from the credit bar was unavailable and GST input tax credit on the leasehold-rights service remained blocked.
Leasehold rights used to obtain land and set up a manufacturing facility were treated as an enabling service received for construction on the appellant's own account, so the first condition of the ITC bar under section 17(5)(d) was satisfied. Applying annexation, object, intendment and marketability tests, the Authority held that the air separation plant was an immovable manufacturing facility meant for permanent beneficial enjoyment of the leased land, not a standalone apparatus, equipment or machinery. As the facility did not fall within the statutory meaning of plant and machinery, the exclusion from the credit bar was unavailable and GST input tax credit on the leasehold-rights service remained blocked.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4819 
Join Channel 
