Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1521 to 1540 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
NSDC-approved training partners conducting NSQF-aligned digital marketing courses were treated as supplying training services exempt under Entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R), because the services fell within the skill development framework covered by the notification. After Notification No. 08/2024-CT(R), NCVET-accredited training bodies and NSDC-approved training partners were treated as separate categories, so the applicant could not claim the NCVET route merely because the course was NSQF-aligned. The exemption for the intervening period was therefore unavailable on the notification wording, but the tax position for that period was directed to be regularised on an as is where is basis, with no tax recoverable if unpaid and no refund if already paid.
NSDC-approved training partners conducting NSQF-aligned digital marketing courses were treated as supplying training services exempt under Entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R), because the services fell within the skill development framework covered by the notification. After Notification No. 08/2024-CT(R), NCVET-accredited training bodies and NSDC-approved training partners were treated as separate categories, so the applicant could not claim the NCVET route merely because the course was NSQF-aligned. The exemption for the intervening period was therefore unavailable on the notification wording, but the tax position for that period was directed to be regularised on an as is where is basis, with no tax recoverable if unpaid and no refund if already paid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.