Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
NSDC-approved training partners conducting NSQF-aligned digital marketing courses were treated as supplying training services exempt under Entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R), because the services fell within the skill development framework covered by the notification. After Notification No. 08/2024-CT(R), NCVET-accredited training bodies and NSDC-approved training partners were treated as separate categories, so the applicant could not claim the NCVET route merely because the course was NSQF-aligned. The exemption for the intervening period was therefore unavailable on the notification wording, but the tax position for that period was directed to be regularised on an as is where is basis, with no tax recoverable if unpaid and no refund if already paid.
NSDC-approved training partners conducting NSQF-aligned digital marketing courses were treated as supplying training services exempt under Entry 69 of Notification No. 12/2017-CT(R), because the services fell within the skill development framework covered by the notification. After Notification No. 08/2024-CT(R), NCVET-accredited training bodies and NSDC-approved training partners were treated as separate categories, so the applicant could not claim the NCVET route merely because the course was NSQF-aligned. The exemption for the intervening period was therefore unavailable on the notification wording, but the tax position for that period was directed to be regularised on an as is where is basis, with no tax recoverable if unpaid and no refund if already paid.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.