Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1641 to 1660 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4826 
Join Channel 
