Condonation of delay in filing GSTR-3B returns and entitlement to Section 62 benefit results in withdrawal of assessments and revocation of attachment...
Penalty for estimation of income and disallowances for tax non-deduction clarified: estimation-based penalties not sustainable; additions without conc...
Managerial remuneration disallowance under s.40A(2)(b) challenged over alleged tax-avoidance; appellate decision restored deletion of addition for dir...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6921 to 6940 of 96406 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.