Fraudulent trading requires cogent evidence of intent to defraud; ordinary-course payments protected, except post-insolvency withdrawals must be resto...
Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Page of 4811
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5681 to 5700 of 96207 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
A proposed contribution of developed leasehold land, constructed hotel floors and related infrastructure to an LLP was treated as a taxable supply of service under the CGST Act. The arrangement was regarded as a transaction between distinct taxable persons, with consideration in non-monetary form because the contributor would receive partnership interest, profit-sharing rights and related commercial benefits. The transfer of leasehold and occupancy rights for hotel business was viewed as supply of service in the course or furtherance of business, not as a mere capital contribution or sale of immovable property outside GST. As the transaction did not fall within Schedule III, GST was held leviable on the proposed arrangement.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.