Proportionality in company penalty quantification requires aggravating and mitigating factors; mechanical multiplication of director liability is impe...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3261 to 3280 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
An educational institution running a school was found to have gross receipts below the prescribed threshold, so it was legally entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal noted that even if exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) was not available, the alternative claim succeeded on the admitted facts of educational activity and receipts within the statutory limit. The alternative plea was therefore accepted, and the exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) was allowed, leaving the other grounds open.
An educational institution running a school was found to have gross receipts below the prescribed threshold, so it was legally entitled to exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad). The Tribunal noted that even if exemption under section 10(23C)(vi) was not available, the alternative claim succeeded on the admitted facts of educational activity and receipts within the statutory limit. The alternative plea was therefore accepted, and the exemption under section 10(23C)(iiiad) was allowed, leaving the other grounds open.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.