Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96177 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside for fresh adjudication where it was levied solely on the basis of the assessment order, without an independent examination in the penalty proceedings and without proper consideration of the assessee's material; the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to provide due opportunity and follow natural justice. On penalty under section 271AAA, the Tribunal held that the provision applies only to a "specified previous year" as defined in the Explanation, and A.Y. 2011-12 did not fall within that description, so the penalty was deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside for fresh adjudication where it was levied solely on the basis of the assessment order, without an independent examination in the penalty proceedings and without proper consideration of the assessee's material; the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to provide due opportunity and follow natural justice. On penalty under section 271AAA, the Tribunal held that the provision applies only to a "specified previous year" as defined in the Explanation, and A.Y. 2011-12 did not fall within that description, so the penalty was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.