Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside for fresh adjudication where it was levied solely on the basis of the assessment order, without an independent examination in the penalty proceedings and without proper consideration of the assessee's material; the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to provide due opportunity and follow natural justice. On penalty under section 271AAA, the Tribunal held that the provision applies only to a "specified previous year" as defined in the Explanation, and A.Y. 2011-12 did not fall within that description, so the penalty was deleted.
Penalty under section 271(1)(c) was set aside for fresh adjudication where it was levied solely on the basis of the assessment order, without an independent examination in the penalty proceedings and without proper consideration of the assessee's material; the matter was restored to the Assessing Officer to provide due opportunity and follow natural justice. On penalty under section 271AAA, the Tribunal held that the provision applies only to a "specified previous year" as defined in the Explanation, and A.Y. 2011-12 did not fall within that description, so the penalty was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
