Pre-existing operational debt disputes require genuine evidence, while undirected running-account payments may be appropriated on a first-in-first-out...
Agency in CNG distribution makes outlet operators commission agents, rendering taxable Business Auxiliary Service rather than purchasing goods for res...
Composite inpatient healthcare supply may retain exemption despite MRP medicine billing, while separate taxable sale characterisation remains disputed...
Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Page of 4827
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1501 to 1520 of 96536 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
For treaty purposes, a taxpayer who was resident in both States under domestic law was treated as resident of Kazakhstan under the Article 4 tie-breaker, because he had no permanent home in India, was based in Kazakhstan, and his personal and economic relations were closer there. Salary earned for employment exercised in Kazakhstan was therefore taxable only in Kazakhstan, and the India addition was deleted. Rental income from a London property was governed by the India-United Kingdom DTAA and, under Article 6, was taxable only in the State where the property was situated, so that addition was also deleted. Dividend income from Netherlands shares was remanded for de novo adjudication under the India-Netherlands DTAA, with foreign tax credit to be considered if taxed in India. Interest income was directed to be taxed at the 10% treaty rate under the India-Kazakhstan DTAA.
For treaty purposes, a taxpayer who was resident in both States under domestic law was treated as resident of Kazakhstan under the Article 4 tie-breaker, because he had no permanent home in India, was based in Kazakhstan, and his personal and economic relations were closer there. Salary earned for employment exercised in Kazakhstan was therefore taxable only in Kazakhstan, and the India addition was deleted. Rental income from a London property was governed by the India-United Kingdom DTAA and, under Article 6, was taxable only in the State where the property was situated, so that addition was also deleted. Dividend income from Netherlands shares was remanded for de novo adjudication under the India-Netherlands DTAA, with foreign tax credit to be considered if taxed in India. Interest income was directed to be taxed at the 10% treaty rate under the India-Kazakhstan DTAA.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.