Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Provisional export assessments of iron ore fines were reconsidered because the original contract terms had been amended for variation in Fe content, moisture and related parameters, and the revised unit price was not fully reflected in the initial assessment. The Tribunal noted that the exporter had not realised any amount beyond the BRC figures and directed re-finalisation of the shipping bills in light of the amended contract, addendum and supporting documents. It also held that a consignment containing some lumps within the tolerated limit remained classifiable as fines, so duty could not be enhanced merely on that basis. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh finalisation, with refund to follow if due.
Provisional export assessments of iron ore fines were reconsidered because the original contract terms had been amended for variation in Fe content, moisture and related parameters, and the revised unit price was not fully reflected in the initial assessment. The Tribunal noted that the exporter had not realised any amount beyond the BRC figures and directed re-finalisation of the shipping bills in light of the amended contract, addendum and supporting documents. It also held that a consignment containing some lumps within the tolerated limit remained classifiable as fines, so duty could not be enhanced merely on that basis. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh finalisation, with refund to follow if due.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.