Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
Provisional export assessments of iron ore fines were reconsidered because the original contract terms had been amended for variation in Fe content, moisture and related parameters, and the revised unit price was not fully reflected in the initial assessment. The Tribunal noted that the exporter had not realised any amount beyond the BRC figures and directed re-finalisation of the shipping bills in light of the amended contract, addendum and supporting documents. It also held that a consignment containing some lumps within the tolerated limit remained classifiable as fines, so duty could not be enhanced merely on that basis. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh finalisation, with refund to follow if due.
Provisional export assessments of iron ore fines were reconsidered because the original contract terms had been amended for variation in Fe content, moisture and related parameters, and the revised unit price was not fully reflected in the initial assessment. The Tribunal noted that the exporter had not realised any amount beyond the BRC figures and directed re-finalisation of the shipping bills in light of the amended contract, addendum and supporting documents. It also held that a consignment containing some lumps within the tolerated limit remained classifiable as fines, so duty could not be enhanced merely on that basis. The appellate order was set aside and the matter remanded for fresh finalisation, with refund to follow if due.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
