Transfer-pricing treatment of ITeS margins excludes pass-through tax recoveries and separate delayed-receivables interest after working-capital adjust...
Capacity-utilisation adjustments under TNMM can neutralise substantiated COVID-related idle costs where underutilisation materially affects profitabil...
TNMM functional comparability requires excluding rice manufacturers from a pure Basmati rice trader's benchmark and recognising operating export recei...
Working-capital adjustment subsumes delayed-receivable effects in TNMM benchmarking of captive software-development services, avoiding separate notion...
Transfer-pricing comparability requires exclusion of financially illogical super-profit comparables and correction of unsupported annual-report and ma...
Charitable character assessment preserves Section 80G approval despite inclusive spiritual teachings and incidental religious expenditure within the s...
Penalty proceedings for cash-loan acceptance require assessment proceedings and recorded Assessing Officer satisfaction; absent these, the proceedings...
Page of 4828
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
161 to 180 of 96556 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
A promoter's restructuring proposal was treated as not being a resolution plan under the I&B Code because it was not submitted in accordance with the CIRP framework, including the expression of interest process and the requirements of Section 30(2). The Appellate Tribunal held that such a proposal could, at best, be considered a Section 12A withdrawal request to financial creditors, not a compliant resolution plan. As no valid plan had been approved, liquidation followed under Section 33(1)(b). The Tribunal also noted that the corporate debtor had already been sold in liquidation and a sale certificate issued, making the appeal infructuous and leaving no effective relief available.
A promoter's restructuring proposal was treated as not being a resolution plan under the I&B Code because it was not submitted in accordance with the CIRP framework, including the expression of interest process and the requirements of Section 30(2). The Appellate Tribunal held that such a proposal could, at best, be considered a Section 12A withdrawal request to financial creditors, not a compliant resolution plan. As no valid plan had been approved, liquidation followed under Section 33(1)(b). The Tribunal also noted that the corporate debtor had already been sold in liquidation and a sale certificate issued, making the appeal infructuous and leaving no effective relief available.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
