Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
Customs relief for Strait of Hormuz maritime disruptions remains available, with existing conditions continuing unchanged through the extended validit...
Grant or renewal of an excise licence remains governed by the Telangana Excise Act and the rules made under it, and is subject to statutory preconditions including payment of the prescribed fee. The insolvency adjudicatory forum cannot, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, override the State's sovereign regulatory domain by directing renewal of the licence or waiving statutory conditions. The direction was also unsustainable because the Excise Department was affected without being impleaded or heard. The impugned order was quashed, while leaving the respondent free to seek any remedy otherwise available in law for refund, adjustment, or renewal in accordance with excise law.
Grant or renewal of an excise licence remains governed by the Telangana Excise Act and the rules made under it, and is subject to statutory preconditions including payment of the prescribed fee. The insolvency adjudicatory forum cannot, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, override the State's sovereign regulatory domain by directing renewal of the licence or waiving statutory conditions. The direction was also unsustainable because the Excise Department was affected without being impleaded or heard. The impugned order was quashed, while leaving the respondent free to seek any remedy otherwise available in law for refund, adjustment, or renewal in accordance with excise law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.