Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Grant or renewal of an excise licence remains governed by the Telangana Excise Act and the rules made under it, and is subject to statutory preconditions including payment of the prescribed fee. The insolvency adjudicatory forum cannot, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, override the State's sovereign regulatory domain by directing renewal of the licence or waiving statutory conditions. The direction was also unsustainable because the Excise Department was affected without being impleaded or heard. The impugned order was quashed, while leaving the respondent free to seek any remedy otherwise available in law for refund, adjustment, or renewal in accordance with excise law.
Grant or renewal of an excise licence remains governed by the Telangana Excise Act and the rules made under it, and is subject to statutory preconditions including payment of the prescribed fee. The insolvency adjudicatory forum cannot, under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, override the State's sovereign regulatory domain by directing renewal of the licence or waiving statutory conditions. The direction was also unsustainable because the Excise Department was affected without being impleaded or heard. The impugned order was quashed, while leaving the respondent free to seek any remedy otherwise available in law for refund, adjustment, or renewal in accordance with excise law.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
