Prohibited importation of cosmetics without prior regulatory registration attracts seizure and confiscation; warehousing or re export claims do not cu...
Provisional release on security permitted where cash deposit plus bond secures differential duty; classification and treaty benefits referred for deci...
Customs Valuation Rule Sequence must be followed; single-comparator re-determination and penalties set aside without comparability or proof of mis-dec...
Separately Identifiable Services: transportation found to be the essential character, so Cargo Handling classification and extended limitation rejecte...
A composite agreement providing both perpetual copyright...
Programme production and copyright assignment can be separately taxed when the agreement shows distinct production activity on behalf of the broadcaster.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
A composite agreement providing both perpetual copyright assignment and production work for a television broadcaster was held to create a separately identifiable taxable service of programme production. The Tribunal found that the appellant was required to produce episodes under the broadcaster's direction, supply tapes before telecast, and submit to quality control, while episode-wise post-telecast consideration indicated payment for production activity. Applying the principle that service tax is levied on activity and that the same transaction may have distinct taxable aspects, the demand was sustained. The extended period and penalty were also upheld because the appellant had withheld disclosure of similar earlier production activity, amounting to wilful suppression with intent to evade tax.
A composite agreement providing both perpetual copyright assignment and production work for a television broadcaster was held to create a separately identifiable taxable service of programme production. The Tribunal found that the appellant was required to produce episodes under the broadcaster's direction, supply tapes before telecast, and submit to quality control, while episode-wise post-telecast consideration indicated payment for production activity. Applying the principle that service tax is levied on activity and that the same transaction may have distinct taxable aspects, the demand was sustained. The extended period and penalty were also upheld because the appellant had withheld disclosure of similar earlier production activity, amounting to wilful suppression with intent to evade tax.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
