Charitable trust registration requires a specified-violation notice; settled cash deposits and related-party payments did not justify cancellation or ...
External development charges trigger TDS under section 194C, while disputed administrative payments require factual verification and fresh adjudicatio...
Section 270AA penalty immunity requires identified statutory defaults and a hearing before rejection; reassessment disclosure may constitute under-rep...
Section 80JJAA employee-cost deduction allowed for deployed staff but barred against transfer-pricing income enhancement, with pricing issues remanded...
Transfer-pricing methodology protects commercially genuine associated-enterprise payments, while pre-2016 secondary adjustments and related notional i...
Negative liens over operating assets can constitute international transactions requiring arm's-length pricing reflecting restricted borrowing and expa...
Cross-examination rights in Customs Broker revocation inquiries require witness examination; procedural denial may be cured through fresh adjudication...
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4827 
Join Channel 
