Imported menthol-scented sweet supari classification dispute: seizure quashed, release for home consumption subject to duty bond; bank guarantee refus...
CKD/SKD air-conditioner components classifiable with finished units by essential character; prior advance ruling extended three years, FTA benefits po...
Scope of judicial review under Article 226: supervisory, not appellate; factual reappraisal barred, challenge dismissed; insolvency professional dutie...
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4824 
Join Channel 
