Proportionate interest, unexplained credits and partner remuneration disputed; proofs of fund nexus and lender identity were decisive and disallowance...
Capital gains valuation from stamp assessment versus net consideration for residential reinvestment: deemed stamp value replaced for gains but not for...
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
The writ challenge to denial of adjustment of excess IGST against ineligible ITC was not examined on merits because the dispute involved several factual issues better suited to statutory appellate scrutiny. The Court relegated the petitioner to the appellate remedy, directed the authority to grant a personal hearing, and left all contentions open for appeal. In doing so, the appellate authority was asked to consider the principles on rectification of bona fide and inadvertent errors stated in Star Engineers I Pvt. Ltd., while the Court itself did not adjudicate the validity of the impugned notifications. The appeal was to be entertained on merits without objection on limitation if filed within the time granted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4817 
Join Channel 
