Reversal of input tax credit in proportion to exempt supply: specificity of show-cause notice required; order set aside, fresh proceedings allowed wit...
Benami transaction and beneficial ownership: documentary and circumstantial evidence show payors were true beneficiaries, resulting in PBPTA consequen...
Denial of Preferential Treatment under SAFTA overturned where unchallenged Country of Origin certificate warranted exemption under Notification benefi...
Page of 4817
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
6881 to 6900 of 96332 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Notice under section 143(2) was held time-barred and also issued before the jurisdictional transfer under section 127 took effect, so the Assessing Officer lacked authority when the notice was served. On that dual basis, the consequent assessment under section 143(3) was declared invalid and quashed. The Tribunal did not entertain the separate challenge to the transfer order under section 127.
Notice under section 143(2) was held time-barred and also issued before the jurisdictional transfer under section 127 took effect, so the Assessing Officer lacked authority when the notice was served. On that dual basis, the consequent assessment under section 143(3) was declared invalid and quashed. The Tribunal did not entertain the separate challenge to the transfer order under section 127.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.