Retrospective application of beneficial circulars upheld, binding officers and granting post adjudication relief where adjudication occurred after cir...
Admissibility of Investigation Statements requires witness examination before the adjudicating authority; otherwise statements cannot sustain a penalt...
Transaction value and connected person treatment in excise valuation: proprietary concerns not inter connected undertakings, relief on valuation and c...
Appointment of Registrars as adjudicating officers under Companies Act reallocates territorial jurisdiction and sets appeal route to Regional Director...
Composite supply of drilling services and site specific chemicals characterised as composite supply; prior advance rulings set aside, tax rate left op...
Declared business receipts under presumptive taxation could not be rejected as bogus merely because sales were concentrated in one month, where the assessee was regularly engaged in scrap trading and had returned income under section 44AD. The Tribunal noted that in such business there was no fixed pattern of purchases and sales, and books of account were not required in the manner assumed by the Assessing Officer. The addition treating the declared sales as unexplained cash credit was based only on suspicion and lacked a sustainable factual basis, so it was deleted.
Declared business receipts under presumptive taxation could not be rejected as bogus merely because sales were concentrated in one month, where the assessee was regularly engaged in scrap trading and had returned income under section 44AD. The Tribunal noted that in such business there was no fixed pattern of purchases and sales, and books of account were not required in the manner assumed by the Assessing Officer. The addition treating the declared sales as unexplained cash credit was based only on suspicion and lacked a sustainable factual basis, so it was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.