Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Provisional preservation of areca nuts did not make the goods classifiable under heading 0812, because that heading applies only to goods that remain unsuitable for immediate consumption in that state. Relying on the reasoning in S. Krishna & Co., the Court held that the imported goods did not satisfy that condition and were therefore classifiable under tariff item 0802, not 0812. The substantial question on tariff classification was answered in favour of the department, and the appeal was allowed.
Provisional preservation of areca nuts did not make the goods classifiable under heading 0812, because that heading applies only to goods that remain unsuitable for immediate consumption in that state. Relying on the reasoning in S. Krishna & Co., the Court held that the imported goods did not satisfy that condition and were therefore classifiable under tariff item 0802, not 0812. The substantial question on tariff classification was answered in favour of the department, and the appeal was allowed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
